Increase Training Impact Through Mind Mapping

Affinity Diagram ProcessDoes this photograph look familiar?   When international NGOs host training workshops, we rely extensively on brainstorming, flip charts and affinity diagramming (think sticky sheets) approaches as a/the primary facilitation tool.  And yet, I would imagine that many of you have wondered (as have I) what happens to all those sticky sheets and flip chart pages once the event is over?

In theory, the sticky sheet diagrams are photographed, and the flip charts are transcribed so that the data can be converted into knowledge, documented and then shared.  Too often, however, this is not the case!  Whether due to resource limitations, competing priorities, and/or the unwieldy nature of flip chart paper and sticky sheets, often the knowledge from these events is never documented, or is documented and shared weeks later – frequently with significant transcription errors.

MindManager ScreenshotIntroducing Mind Mapping applications – software that allows trainers to easily collect brainstorming ideas,   organize them into visual diagrams, and at the push of a button save the image into a .pdf file.  These .pdf files are ready seconds after your session is complete and can be shared via e-mail, uploaded to your intranet, or distributed any way you would exchange a computer file.  Furthermore, many of these Mind Mapping applications have features that allow you to convert your map into a Word document that is organized in outline format.  Envision your visual brainstorming results converted into a Word format that is immediately ready to embed in the minutes of your meeting or workshop!

There are many mind map software vendors , and a quick Google search will identify at least a dozen options to choose from.  One that I find particularly strong is MindManager (sold by Mindjet  for about $349.00 (windows) and $129 (Mac).)  In the words of Frank Ryan, Head of Library and Information Services at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, “MindManager has saved me countless hours in planning reports and presentations and I have used it very successfully to simplify complex issues. It is very easy to use and Mind Maps can be converted into low-memory PDFs.”

A free, open-source alternative is FreeMind While I have no personal experience using the Free Mind product, it comes highly recommended by the people on the Knowledge Management for Development List Serve.  If any of you have experimented with FreeMind, let us know about your experience by adding a comment to this blog post.

3 thoughts on “Increase Training Impact Through Mind Mapping

  1. My only comment on the mind mapping tools is that they are mostly hub-spoke diagramming tools and a lot of the work I’m doing with groups is not always hub-spoke in its format. I’ve tried some concept mapping tools, but they are not great visually and require more sophistication in use. So I still am looking for visual organizing tools that are more flexible than the mind mapping.

    What has had great impact and we have been able to do online is around network mapping – with both paper and pen and digital cameras, and now experimenting with computer assisted tools (Vizualyzer).

    We have people map their networks on paper with postits and pens, take pictures, upload to discussion space and then we have an asynch discussion about the maps. (This could be done in a live web meeting as well.) The mapper can then revise their map (move postits or redo) and reupload based on what they learned through conversation with peers. These mind maps then become a key artifact to tracking project progress.

    The role of visuals is incredibly important. I’m very eager to learn/invent new ways to use them in our online learning and working.

  2. Nancy – Your observeration on the limitations of many mind mapping tools to hub and spoke relationships is valid. I have not used Visualiyzer and look forward to experminting.

    A recent exchange on the km4dev list serve had an interesting observation from a poster who indicated taht he prefers to create knowledge using a markers, post it notes and flip charts – while he prefers to use the mind mapping tools to document information and communicate it easily via electronic formats.

    While this approach might not be as streamlined as working exclusively in a technology assisted environment, it might be a compromise that benefits from the best of both worlds.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s